What lead you to the MEA device and do you feel a difference?
Hi Mike.
That is complex and I will write a future article about that in my Blog. I had a āgut feelingā, like with ICES and the communication with Rob Gourlay, the inventor and founder, was fruitful, respectful and open. It gave me lots of new insights, even If I see some things with the theory of things different.
Also Mea devices do more then increase the āBovisā level. Water and wine taste clearly better and my āimpartialā tomatoes like it, too (hands are glove size 11):
The foil tunnel is without electro-culture gadgets. Meawater treated rainwater only. Pure clay rich soil, no extra compost. But, as usual, several factors come together and one location may be energywise better then the other, have more paragagnetic particles in the soil, etc.
Of course there are other devices, which do great water, too and are much cheaper. So I operate them, at least for the house, since some āwear over timeā in a cascade. Thing is: Without āMea treatmentā first, all other approaches seem much less effective.
At the end of this article you will find some older comments of mine on the topic.
Short answer- Hans (HCF) shared some information on these topics and some guidance on researching the topic for myself. He also shared a bit of his experience with Rober Gourlayās Mea water devices. One of the things I think I understand is that taking on a negative charge, via grounding, drinking water with a negative charge, etc. is beneficial in that your cells have to give off less electrons to interact with substances (nutrients, etc.), leaving your cells at a higher energy state. The MEA water device is supposed to give the water run through it a negative charge. Honestly I havenāt really noticed a significant difference, I am getting older and havenāt exactly taken the best care of myself over the years⦠largely taking my health for granted. So these days I try to educate myself on these topics and take steps where I can to give my body the best chance to remain healthy for as long as possible.
Hi Gunplt,
thanks for extending my answer. The thing with the ānegative chargeā is the only one, that I canāt really follow. I think its negatively polarized, not charged. You can measure polarization, but not a ānegative chargeā in a beaker without reference!
Thing is, MeaWater with its approx. 50K Bovis and informational resetting is only one of many factors. In todays world there are many āenergy suckersā.
Most what people do not grasp is technical, vertical and horizontal polarized (microwave) and other harmful EMF - ICES excluded
Everywhere there are energy suckers⦠tap water, industrial food, LED light, chemicals, building materials, fungal agents, antibiotics, wrong architecture, āstressā and also bad habbits. Health is like a marble - you have to tackle all directions, piece by piece, tomorrow better then today.
And: MeaWater is ONE approach with its unique limits. There are other approaches with other limits. There is no ābestā in Water to my knowledge. I personally like the Mea approach. But you can combine them in a row - when you can test the result, because the order of things matters!
Best,
Hans
Hi Hans
I was just late at replying to @MikeT. I suppose I may be conflating my mechanistic (and most certainly incomplete) understanding of Earthing/grounding with my even more incomplete understanding of biophysics. It was a feeble attempt at describing my perhaps incorrect concept of free electrons. These processes are so nuanced and complex. I find it difficult to visualize and retain these concepts. But I continue the struggle to learn and understand. And I very much appreciate your input and knowledge Hans!
Colin
I have been drinking structured water for years, since mining magnatite sand in the Sierras and making tubes for my water bottles. Iāve subsequently shifted to more space-saving methods. Iāve used my M1 (annoying cords), QuantumBalancingās neodymium water vortex magnets (labor intensive) and Iām now using Noxtakās Spiro card (the simplest and prettiest solution). I find structured water goes down easier, with less effort in the swallow, Thatās why I judge it reasonable to say this water is more ābioavailable.ā Everyone I have asked to do comparative taste-testing says that it is āeasier to swallow.ā