I have been doing some research on Nanoparticle risks. There is a serious concern amongst those whom have been vaccinated that Graphene oxide is in the vials, and also delivered via chem trails, in processed foods, water, and lab grown alternative meats, etc. The issued warning is that Graphene Oxide can be used to form microscopic wires within tissue. There is a concern that PEMF may activate or engage in some way to cause biological harm via EMF sensitivity, triggering auto-immune illness, and assist in transmission via AI tech.
I wonder if anyone else is concerned or has additional information regarding how PEMF can potentially accelerate automation and contribute to disease within the human body? Speculation around the use of Nano-metal therapy, such as Colloidal Silver, Gold, etc., have also been implicated.
Hi Jill,
I get sometimes asked by friends and clients similar questions. Lots is crazed and where graphene oxide is used it is labled or not. Its the same with BPA and all other stuff. If you are in doubt -> don’t do it. Do whats done 100 or 150 years ago. Or do it “the Amish way” 
When it is in the body of others, I would not worry about myself, but the other. The thing with “assembling” computer chips and the like is bull****. Only people who do not understand anything about it can believe such stories.
What is crazy is to swallow colloidal Silver, Gold and the like. These are heavy metals with no known use in the human body except trouble. There are basically no studies. At the nanoscale physics change based on size and other attributes. So what is valid for 100 nm particles must not be for 10 nm particles.
Lab grown meat? Do not buy it! Maybe in injections? Do not take them if you worry.
Biggest problem i see is that everyone runs around with a microwave blaster or installs microwave “hot spots”. They do also harm me.
On the worry-pyramid, I would first worry about all about all microwave! Mobile communication, WLAN, Bluetooth, smart home stuff, baby-phones and the like. If it has wireless -> don’t do it / don’t buy it.
Best,
Hans
Thank you, Hans.
I agree with most of what you assert, however, I am learning discernment and am skeptical regarding the safety of NANO. Likely we will likely learn the risks 40-50 years down the road.
Since you are well informed, and believe colloidal metals are harmful, what is your opinion for others, on using PEMF having ingested them for months or years? It seems that there could or should be some laboratory evidence on how PEMF responds to mice or humans whom have used these and other potential signal disruptors, no?
P.S I have been reforming my ways to a more Amish lifestyle, too! The skies here are thick with chemtrail sprayed fogs for weeks now where I live, and I have identified, what looks to be Seracia Marcescensce bacteria. This was sprayed in San Francisco and wreaked havoc in the 70’s.
Hi Jill,
Most nano is problematic, because “we no not know”. Here I agree and did not write otherwise. I’m only against causing fear on no substantial information as it is done lots of times in the net.
Regarding colloids: Inductive power transfer is efficient in conductive and non-magnetic or weakly magnetic metals . These metals allow the generation of eddy currents , which can be converted into electrical energy or heat.
Affected are: Cu, Al, Au, Ag, Brass etc.
Magnetic metals can also have power induced in them: Fe, Ni, Co.
Stainless steel and Ti are much less affected by all.
Hg is diamagnetic and you can also induct power into it.
Hem has an Fe center. Ceruloplasmin has lots of Cu in its structure. Do we have to worry?
There are many other factors we do not even know! Magnetic polarization, spin, maybe longitudal / scalar wave effects? Some people even associate the magnetic and dielectric with the ether.
I think it is hard to only focus on such a subject alone. Anyway - i would not put Au and Ag in my body. I like them much more as shiny coins to put them where they came from
Best,
Hans
Hi Jill. Regardless of whether it’s true that some injections contain nanotech (there are those that claim it does not and others with claims of evidence it does), have personally suspected that PEMF would be beneficial for destroying nanotech.
EMF can power NFC technology passively because it has sufficient energy to activate it.
My theory is that the fragile nanotech circuitry could not withstand the effects of inductive ICES/PEMF.
If it’s true that dirty EMF short wave can power nanotech it’s probably by design and requires certain energy volumes and frequency ranges.
So, I would argue that ELF PEMF may do the opposite. I’ve read a few places where others have made that claim too.
I haven’t seen any instances where people using it have actually been MADE WORSE only felt worse as the body was changing/healing crisis.
That seems plausible to me. The ICES dB/dt rate is very high and would overwhelm any very small energy harvesting units not specifically created for that kind of energy.