Flux Health Forum

Intensity observation & measurements

PEMF Basics
#1

Hello all & @Bob

I’ve made some (non-transversal) field measurements, that corespondent with my other observations:

  • Intensity 7, 8, 9 seem to provide a very “nurishing” bio-energetic field with a high “net-positive” Qi
  • Intensity 13, 14, 15, especially 15, seem to have a “vacuuming” field, where a “negative” bio-energy (e.g. hot or fresh inflammation) is drained while still infusing a nurishing (positive, structured) filed but more with a “net-zero-sum” (or bit less) in total.
  • Intensities 7, 8, 9 have a very small “vacuuming” field, too - buts that it. It gets much stronger (in relation) with Intensity 10, while also the total intensity increases.

This would explain why most chronic things benefit from the mid-intensities and why the high intensities help with fresh wounds and maybe deep inflammatory and bio-energetic negative issues. Still one may want to finish a 15 session with some 8 or 9 intensity minutes in relation to the “15” time.

I can measure that what I wrote consistently cross many “tools”, “devices” and other things I and I have explanation models why/what I measure - but I like to keep it simple for now.

For people that now Spurlings tensor-tools like AcuVac and Feedback-Loop:

  • Intensity 14, 15 are like using an actual Feedback-Loop
  • Intensity 7,8,9 are more like using the pearl side of a AcuVac

One can compare even some the basic field qualities between them. But I did not measure out which compares to what most (like Sacred, Lost, Empowerment, Sacred ND, Lost ND characteristics).

Best,
hans

2 Likes
#2

Hello all,

since no one replied, I shorten the observation:

  • Intensity 14/15: “Hot” Inflammation, fresh wound, infection, migraine, and the line - draws “bad energy”, returns “good”
  • Intensity 7/8/9: Chronic “thing” that needs energy / life force to heal better - max. supply of “good” energy, minimal “draw”.

I have an explanation for this, but in short it is the same as Slim Spurling gives vor the AcuVac (perl side -> 7/8/9) or the Feedback-Loop (-> 14/15). Only that ICES does it with high intensity, ultrashort, EM-pulses and therefore ICES adds an extra physical (and most probably metaphysical) dimension / energy to the whole thing.

Maybe someone can share experiences.

Best,
Hans

2 Likes
#3

Let me ask our Hari Japanese Acpuncturist tomorrow and see how he would characterize 14/15 versus 7/8/9.

1 Like
#4

The observations/measurements you shared are without regard to protocol - only in regards to intensity?

#5

Yes! This relates only to the intensity. Th pulses are identical in each protocol, only the pattern is different.

#6

@TajD: Did you get some answers from your Acupuncturist?

#7

Sorry forgot to ask - will ask next Friday.

#8

Our Hari Japanese Acupuncturist who is extremely energy sensitive said he finds the same results as your assessment. He explained to me that in Chinese medicine, there are qualities of tonification and dispersion.

He noted a distinct difference: ICES PEMF lower intensity is tonifying, giving more energy. In contrast, the higher intensities tax the body’s energy and is of a more dispersive quality. That is, it is removing obstructions - taking this away for the body to restore.
Higher intensities are more dispersive. The lower intensities are tonifying.

1 Like
#9

Thanks @TajD! Its also good to know for me, that TCM has identical concepts for what I mean with specific names. I hope, that also @Bob reads this.

I think it is important to know/describe that - because this impacts the usage patterns of ICES:

  • 8-10 -> Primarily net positive influx of coherence/energy (BG3). Does not touch negative potential (vertical Green-)
  • 13-15 -> Net reductive outfux of negative energy (vertical Green-) with balancing influx (BG3).

Some things need outflux of bad energy. But you only can do that, when there still is (net) negative energy, because if not, intensity 13-15 will cannibalizing life-force (BG3, etc.) - so the treatment will not be effective.

I found that other PEMF low-power devices, but also other healing tools, work in the same fashion.

#10

Super interesting. He made a similar comment to what you just additionally wrote. He gave the example that if someone has a chronic disease with low energy, that 13-15 would NOT be appropriate to use in that circumstance, but the tonifying intensities of 8-10 would be appropriate, and you explained it very similarly! This seems to support why intensity 15 works to remove migraines for me.

#11

Thanks for the additional feedback!

Migraines are a Green- vertical field.This has to be “sucked” out. And this is done by “15”. Even better may be a pure “sucking” field without influx for the first minutes. But the dynamics there are tricky. ICES how it is may be the best all-round solution there is. I did not really get further with other approaches regarding my wife - also from the point of portability and applicability.