Flux Health Forum

Intensity observation & measurements

PEMF Basics
#1

Hello all & @Bob

I’ve made some (non-transversal) field measurements, that corespondent with my other observations:

  • Intensity 7, 8, 9 seem to provide a very “nurishing” bio-energetic field with a high “net-positive” Qi
  • Intensity 13, 14, 15, especially 15, seem to have a “vacuuming” field, where a “negative” bio-energy (e.g. hot or fresh inflammation) is drained while still infusing a nurishing (positive, structured) filed but more with a “net-zero-sum” (or bit less) in total.
  • Intensities 7, 8, 9 have a very small “vacuuming” field, too - buts that it. It gets much stronger (in relation) with Intensity 10, while also the total intensity increases.

This would explain why most chronic things benefit from the mid-intensities and why the high intensities help with fresh wounds and maybe deep inflammatory and bio-energetic negative issues. Still one may want to finish a 15 session with some 8 or 9 intensity minutes in relation to the “15” time.

I can measure that what I wrote consistently cross many “tools”, “devices” and other things I and I have explanation models why/what I measure - but I like to keep it simple for now.

For people that now Spurlings tensor-tools like AcuVac and Feedback-Loop:

  • Intensity 14, 15 are like using an actual Feedback-Loop
  • Intensity 7,8,9 are more like using the pearl side of a AcuVac

One can compare even some the basic field qualities between them. But I did not measure out which compares to what most (like Sacred, Lost, Empowerment, Sacred ND, Lost ND characteristics).

Best,
hans

2 Likes
#2

Hello all,

since no one replied, I shorten the observation:

  • Intensity 14/15: “Hot” Inflammation, fresh wound, infection, migraine, and the line - draws “bad energy”, returns “good”
  • Intensity 7/8/9: Chronic “thing” that needs energy / life force to heal better - max. supply of “good” energy, minimal “draw”.

I have an explanation for this, but in short it is the same as Slim Spurling gives vor the AcuVac (perl side -> 7/8/9) or the Feedback-Loop (-> 14/15). Only that ICES does it with high intensity, ultrashort, EM-pulses and therefore ICES adds an extra physical (and most probably metaphysical) dimension / energy to the whole thing.

Maybe someone can share experiences.

Best,
Hans

1 Like
#3

Let me ask our Hari Japanese Acpuncturist tomorrow and see how he would characterize 14/15 versus 7/8/9.

1 Like
#4

The observations/measurements you shared are without regard to protocol - only in regards to intensity?

#5

Yes! This relates only to the intensity. Th pulses are identical in each protocol, only the pattern is different.