Flux Health Forum

Decreased Coil power?

I am using the a9 for my cats kidneys.
I have her separated from my other cats due to an infection.

Being that she is alone while I’m at work I have a small, battery operated radio in the bathroom with her.

What I noticed is that when the a9 is on I can hear the pulses on the radio, which is pretty cool.

What I noticed today is that I didn’t really hear the pulses so much while using the square pad, they were much lower than usual. But when I switched to the single coils the pulsing were as they had been.

I even switched back and forth to make sure it wasn’t me and it’s not.

I checked to make sure they are working with the chip tester and they are.

Do the coils start losing power as they wear down, but still show as working with the chip?

The square pad is on for much longer than the single coils so that would make sense.

I don’t want to jeopardize her treatment which is why I always test them. But with the pad having less pulse volume now where as they were equal previously with the single coils through the radio it has me concerned.
Thanks to all

I have a c5 and i use a trimeter to measure the magnetic field. I’ve been running my device for the past 3 weeks 21-22 hours a day and i noticed a drop in range. Hope we can get an answer. I ordered new coils today to be safe.

Tagging @Bob and @hcf for any insights.

Lots of things could be an issue, mainly the exact placement of coils with respect to the sensing elements in the tri-meter. Just being mis-aligned by 1 mm will change the readings noticeably.

Also, be sure to clean the gold contacts on the coil plug.

BTW, a tri-meter is an inherently inaccurate way to measure ICES-PEMF pulses. So you might also be reading too much into the measurements it gives you.

Just for fun and learning I have considered 3D printing a distance indicating jig to hold the tester that comes with the ICES devices. Then I could play around with measurement of field depth/area, and also stacking of coils and the impact that has on the resultant field.