Flux Health Forum

Cancer cannot exist in a (high) magnetic field

Cancer
#1

Maybe interesting for some. It is out of a 50 year old book that reports on permanent magnetism application, different effects for north and south pole. It also mentiones another researcher than the author (Sierra, “Power in a Magnet”) with an interesting quote.

Sierra, as others, did arrest cancer with north pole magnetism, Kenneth with probably electromagnetism. Several things seem to work. Important: Its about a) Magnetism in different forms and b) about polarity that seems to make differences.

Let me thing on ICES stacked coils which produces a focussed, well defined, punctual (high) magnetic field with (field) proven effect on the bodily systems.

cancer-cannot-exist-in-a-high-magnetic-field
cancer-cannot-exist-in-a-high-magnetic-field644×571 82.1 KB

P.S.: If this has to be removed through copyright reasons I can type it down. But I thought that this is more clear.

#2

What are the differents effects for north and south pole? Mthx

#3

In “very short”:

North: Arrest / stabilize -> Inflammation, cancer, blood flow
South: Grow / expand -> Everything! Bone, tissue, cancer, bacteria, blood flow…

So human application uses basically only north, except in some controlled cases where cancer, bacteria infection and the like can be excluded. Plants, seeds can be treated with south.

Some books you will find at “Annas Archive”. They are all out of print and some very expensive to obtain.

Best,
Hans

#4

What is the book information? I’d like to get it.

#5

As I wrote: Sierra, “Power in a Magnet” - you can use that for a search. This is the only book that still is in print. Its sold by Health Magnetic Store, the daughter of the original author.

1 Like
#6

@hcf have you seen this NOVOTTF-100A? I’d be curious to have your take as you synthesize it relative to your schema on electromagnetism and ICES PEMF. An oncology radiologist informed me she uses this device for her GBM patients if they can’t get into the new vaccine trials. She has a patient on year 6 of using this technology go keep GBM at bay which is very impressive. I noticed it says alternating fields…

#7

No.

With TTF they may try to obscure the fact of electromagnetic fields. And of course they are alternating. They must -> db/dt or Tesla/s.

Try to use a B5 and then only the unipolar wave cycle and then try to find out which is which with the coils. If you get a north magnetic field, I would use that for the tumor in addition to a permanent magnet. But with a permanent magnet its not as simple with the intensity / dimensions and penetration depth. Davis & Rawls never published specifics. Here are some videos: https://www.youtube.com/@biomagneticsusa5010

With cancer I would use anyway a combined approach. Without fixing the teeth in total, there will be no “fix”… plus lots of other things. Here a overview, in case you are curious.